by Sarah Nunnink, Ph.D.
Yet, most older couples (whether gay or straight) report a sexual pulse that, while declining in terms of frequency and intensity, is certainly palpable.
Older adults are often dealing with major transitional and generational/contextual issues that affect their marital dynamic that can cross over into the bedroom as well.
- Prejudicial stereotypes of older people as asexual, sickly, irrelevant and unimportant
- Retirement from employment in one or both partners, resulting in a loss of social status, identity, power and self-worth
- Physical illness in one or both partners, leading to an increased need for dependency on loved ones/partner;
- The direct or indirect (e.g., medication-related) effects of physical illness on sexual functioning
- Generational social conditioning of men (especially older men) to be emotionally “strong,” avoid expressions of vulnerability and be “emotionally independent” or self-sufficient
- Significant loneliness in older age, and sense of disconnection coupled with a deep human longing for physical contact/touch
- Death of a partner and the need to develop new relationships, as well as the possibility of “blended” families with multiple marriages across the lifetime
- Changes to physical appearance, body, hormones, and sexual physiology that accompany aging or illness, including 1) menopause, lower vaginal elasticity and arousal, greater possibility of dyspareunia for women, 2) declining testosterone levels, erectile difficulties or decreased penile sensitivity for men, and 3) lower desire or frequency of sex for the majority of older individuals. Vasoactive agents (e.g., sildenafil) are often offered as a first line treatment for men and estrogen cream or supplement may help for women – however, given the contextual issues surrounding sex and the senior couple, even if the “mechanics” of sex improve, often the sexual satisfaction may not
Despite these challenges, older couples also have significant strengths:
The longer term pair-bonds of older couples, some of whom have been together for decades and have a shared history
Greater emotional intimacy and the capacity to truly see and be seen by our partners, resulting in the potential of optimal sexuality, and the possibility of intimacy-driven sexual behavior as opposed to strictly mechanistic and performance-based sex
Sex is one of the most sensitive barometers of the general functioning of a relationship; it often serves as the “red flag” that the relationship is in trouble (or has been for quite some time). Historically, the field of couples therapy has often underemphasized the role of sex, whereas the sexual health field originally focused on the mechanisms or “medicalization” of sex, missing the larger contextual framework in which sexual problems arose. Recently, there has been a welcome converging of the fields, and the work of Sue Johnson, Ed.D. using an Emotion Focused (EFT) and Sex Therapy integrated model, is particularly promising.
From an EFT framework, the sexual system is one of the three primary ingredients in the formation of adult romantic bonds, resting between the attachment and caregiving systems. Sex often facilitates the development of the attachment bond between partners, though its significance wanes in later stages of the relationship (Johnson & Zuccarini, 2011). In EFT, a securely attached bond that is defined by emotional accessibility and responsiveness allows integration of all three systems. In an insecurely attached bond, it is common to see couples presenting with sexual complaints, which might include an anxious approach for sex or, alternatively, an avoidant deactivation within the sexual dynamic. In other words, in a distressed couple, one partner might anxiously pursue sex as an attempt at attachment soothing (reassurances of attractiveness, desirability, confirmation of their importance to their partner in order to “calm” fears of abandonment). Conversely, an avoidant partner might present by minimizing internal emotions, sexual cues and needs in order to soothe attachment fears of rejection by partner (avoid sex altogether, focus on the “performance” or mechanics of sex without allowing emotional engagement). Importantly, these dynamics of pursuit and withdrawal, while clearly apparent in the realm of sexuality and the “presenting problem”, are also typically more broadly seen within the couple’s general relational style with self and other. From an EFT perspective, it is necessary to address such a negative “cycle” both within and outside of the context of the bedroom. Either of the insecure styles of engagement listed above (approach/avoid) often lead couples down a troubling path that includes a general restriction in the possible healthy or optimal ways sex could function in their relationship. In such distressed and insecure bonds, sex can be described as non-pleasurable, pressured, dry and mechanical, task-oriented, constricted, rigid, “stale,” “lonely”, burdensome and one-dimensional.
For senior couples, some of the very issues that are contextually relevant to this population might readily “bleed” into bedroom. For example, consider the male partner (in a gay or straight couple) who has grown-up with gender-stereotypical messages of emotional restriction. He is told to “buck up and be strong…boys don’t cry,” influencing a lifelong stance of unhealthy independence and self-reliance. As this individual ages, imagine the difficulties that might arise when physical illness sets in, he requires a greater degree of reliance and “leaning into” his partner for assistance with tasks of living, all the while experiencing significant internal conflict with this human dependency need, his sexual potency (as a result of general aging/illness AND psychogenic dependency issues) declines and he is operating under the implicit emotional messages from a lifetime of social emotional learning that says “don’t reach out” and “don’t show weakness.” It would not be uncommon in such a scenario for the male partner to present alone in “secret” to his primary care doctor with a request for “Viagra.” Yet providing such a prescription may or may not improve the “mechanics” of sex in terms of “performance’, and often results in continued complaints of low desire or low satisfaction with sex for one or both partners.
The beauty of the EFT model of integrated sex/couples therapy is that the “emotional truth,” meaning and relevance of the “presenting sexual problem” is seen within the larger view of the attachment bond.
This allows for sex to function as just one of many ways couples can connect. From this viewpoint, compartmentalizing sex as separate from the relationship and from emotional experience is problematic.
Anderson, C., Dimidjian, S. & Miller, A. (1995). Redefining the past, present and future: therapy with long-term marriages at midlife. In N. Jacobson & A. Gurman (Eds). Clinical Handbook of Couple Therapy. (pp.247-260).
Goldstein S. & Preston, J. (1984). Marital therapy for the elderly. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 130, 1551-1553.
Johnson, S. & Zuccarini, D. (2010). Integrating sex and attachment in emotionally focused couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(4), 431-445.
Johnson, S & Zuccarini, D. (2011). EFT for Sexual Issues An integrated Model of Couple and Sex Therapy. In J.Furrow, S. Johnson & B. Bradley (Eds.). The Emotionally Focused Case Book: New Directions in Treating Couples (pp. 219-246)
Leiblum, S & Segraves, R. (2000). Sex therapy with aging adults. In S. Leiblum & R. Rosen (Eds.). Principles and Practice of Sex Therapy, Third Edition (pp. 423-448)
Johnson, Sue (2016, March 31). Attachment and the Dance of Sex: Integrating Couple and Sex Therapy. Retrieved from http://drsuejohnson.com/attachment-sex/attachment-and-the-dance-of-sex-integrating-couple-and-sex-therapy/
Print a copy of this article here.